#OPENSEA Gets EXCLUSIVE #NFTDeal to offer a Non-fungible token of #COVID19Dossier – ONE person will get the right to buy THE ORIGINAL MP3 Audiobook File Sent to Donald Trump on #NFT #NFTs: BID NOW: https://opensea.io/assets/0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e/41314482428197005280555066651670080632515441313460844824046079247444135116801
#FauciDossierNFT –> A non-fungible token (NFT) is a digital file whose unique identity and ownership are verified on a blockchain (a digital ledger). NFTs are not mutually interchangeable (see fungibility). NFTs are commonly created by uploading files, such as digital artwork, to an auction market. This creates copies of the files, which are recorded as NFTs on the digital ledger. The tokens can then be bought with cryptocurrency and resold.
NFTs can be used to commodify digital creations, such as digital art, video game items, and music files. Access to any copy of the original file, however, is not restricted to the owner of the token. The speculative market for NFTs soared in early 2021 when the same investors who had speculated on cryptocurrencies traded NFTs at greatly increasing volumes. NFTs mostly run on a proof-of-work blockchain, which is less energy efficient than a proof-of-stake blockchain, which has resulted in some criticism of the carbon footprint for NFT transactions.
Buy PRINT COPY of the #COVID19 #FauciDossier before it’s remove on #AMAZON: https://amzn.to/3ll0Jeq
World shocking evidence exposing big pharma and naming names in true crimes against humanity in preventative medicine. This vaccine patent and fraud research book free with limited edition collectible cover artwork by Stan Q. Upjohn. Dossier evidences medical crimes against humanity for financial gain of puppet masters. Dossier by Dr. Martin is fully released under a Creative Commons license CC- BY-NC-SA. For twenty years my company M·CAM has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction(the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors.
Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations. The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University ofNorth Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit. In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.
“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.” On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans. Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution ef
forts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature.
This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Wake up and read this: http://FauciDossier.com