BEST Martial Arts School Marketing Commercial ever – Eddie Bravo 10th Planet School Promotional Branding Video by Bobby Razak

eddie-bravoBEST Martial Arts School Marketing Commercial ever – Eddie Bravo 10th Planet School Promotional Branding Video by Bobby Razak

I’ve studied marketing for 21 years and seen and helped produce hundreds of grappling school videos and promotional clips. This commercial is the highest tech editing software together with Hollywood quality editing, graphics, animation and acting. Business minds are stepping up their game! This “10th Planet 2015 Commercial by Bobby Razak” is the best school branding commercial ever produced in the history of martial arts. Great job Eddie Bravo and Bobby Razak!!! Keep evolving EVERYONE and bravely produce your own masterpiece that will push the industry envelope even further!

VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS – UFC 171 Champion Johny Hendricks at Grapplers Quest vs. Ben Henderson and Gilbert Melendez

VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS – UFC 171 Champion Johny Hendricks at Grapplers Quest vs. Ben Henderson and Gilbert Melendez

DALLAS, TEXAS – On Saturday, March 15, 2014, Robbie Lawler and Johnny Hendricks met for the Vacant UFC Welterweight Championship of the World. Johny reigned victorious via decision after Five Rounds and “WON THE CROWN” and is the NEW Welterweight Champion of the World.

Is Freedom of Speech is Dead? I Wanna Minecraft vs. I Wanna Rock – Dee Snider vs. Brian Cimins – MinecraftSongs vs. Spitfire Records, Razor & Tie, Atlantic Records, Secret Records

The song, “I Wanna Minecraft” lyrics and graphics were all created by me personally. We received notice that our original work, “Matched 3rd Party Content”. Obviously, it is a Parody Song of Twisted Sister’s “I Wanna Rock” and called, “I Wanna Minecraft”, but we changed the score and lyrics completely. We performed it and recorded it with a team, instrument by instrument, line by line and created all of the original artwork and animation for this music video. Now YouTube is trying to deny our revenues for the VIRAL sensation video because of “copyright law infringement”. I was bullied once in my life when I didn’t know trademark or copyright law, but this time, I’m fighting YouTube and we will win!

Please read this below about Parody and Free Speech in America – Parodies are PROTECTED original works of art. These artists should be flattered that we are going back 30 years to revive 80s songs to cross-market the new video game age customers to your entire musical genre. I’m sure Dee Snider would be fine with it, but his record label is not.

Parody is part of Free Speech and when the United States Founding Fathers framed The Constitution, they made sure that Americans would always have the right to peacefully protest and criticize. In America, one of the forms of criticism that’s specifically protected is parody. A parody is a work that imitates another work for the purpose of ridicule or ironic commentary. The US Supreme Court recognizes parody as a protected form of free speech, and parodies are even given special rights under copyright law. As a result of hundreds of years of protecting parodies, the concept of parody has been firmly rooted in American culture. Parodies of celebrities and public figures are on popular television and radio shows. There are also parody magazines, parody songs, and entire parody movies. There are even parody websites. Ironically, politicians themselves are among the most frequently parodied figures. Constitutional Convention Parody and Copyright Law Parodies, by their nature, typically make use of other works: music, art, corporate logos, advertisements, etc. Obviously, the creators and owners of copyrighted works are unlikely to grant permission for their works to be used in a parody. However, American society recognizes the cultural value of parody as a form of criticism and commentary, so the use of such copyrighted works for purposes of parody is often considered “fair use”, and is thus perfectly legal. The section of US law that deals with fair use is Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107: Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use.[1] Here’s the exact text of the law: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. Parody is recognized as a form of criticism and commentary. Here’s how a parody might be considered, in light of the four factors above used to determine fair use: Purpose and character; commercial or educational — noncommercial, educational, or newsworthy parodies are generally given more protection as fair use under this first factor. However, many commercial parodies have also been deemed to be fair use, as the Supreme Court has held that “a work’s commercial nature is only one element of the first factor enquiry into its purpose and character”.[2] Nature of the work copyrighted — this factor has been said to carry little weight in parody situations, “since parodies almost invariably copy publicly known, expressive works”.[2] Amount and substantiality — with parodies, a fairly extensive use of the copyrighted work is permitted. Copying is considered in relation to parodic purpose — a parodist can copy as much as is needed to “conjure up” the original. Even the “heart” of a work may be copied for parody, if it’s the heart at which the parody is aimed.[2] Potential effect on the market — it is understood that an effective parody “may be so good that the public can never take the original work seriously again”.[3] Thus, with parodies, the possibility of destroying the market for the original work isn’t measured. Instead, what’s analyzed is the potential of the parody to fulfill the market demand of the original work. Since most parodies don’t compete with the original works they are parodying, this factor is usually not an issue. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music One of the Supreme Court cases that’s frequently cited in parody situations is Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, which involved a copyright dispute over a song by the rap music group 2 Live Crew, headed by Luther Campbell. 2 Live Crew had composed a song called “Pretty Woman”, which was a parody of the 1964 Roy Orbison hit song, “Oh, Pretty Woman”. Acuff-Rose Music was the publishing company that managed the rights to the Orbison song, and 2 Live Crew asked them if they could license it for purposes of parody. Acuff-Rose denied their request — 2 Live Crew ignored them, and produced the song anyway. The 2 Live Crew parody song sold nearly a quarter of a million copies. Acuff-Rose Music sued for copyright infringement. After a District Court decision in favor of 2 Live Crew, and a reversal at the Court of Appeals, the case reached the Supreme Court in November of 1993. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Luther Campbell and 2 Live Crew. Even though the 2 Live Crew parody song was commercial (and profitable), The Supreme Court held that the commercial nature of the parody was not enough to render it unfair use, and that “a parody’s commercial character is only one element that should be weighed in a fair use inquiry.”[2] While 2 Live Crew had copied a substantial amount of the “heart” of the original Orbison song, the Supreme Court said that “the heart is also what most readily conjures up the song for parody, and it is the heart at which parody takes aim”.[2] The Supreme Court also clarified the interpretation of a parody’s potential effect on the market. It’s understood that a parody, like any negative review, can destroy the market for the original work. Therefore, in parody situations, what’s measured is “market substitution, not any harm from criticism”; whether the parody can substitute for the original in the market, not whether the parody will harm the market for the original work. A parody is considered unlikely to act as a substitute for an original work, since it usually serves a different market purpose. The unanimous ruling in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music significantly strengthened the fair use defense for parodists. Despite commercial profit, substantial copying, and allegations of market harm, the 2 Live Crew song had been protected from a charge of copyright infringement by one defining condition — it was a parody.

This Month's Featured Entrepreneur - JenEricCraftWorks, Scrap Booking and Art Decorations and Designs - Please Support Hard Working Entrepreneurs and Products Made in America

JenEricCraftWorks is the type of company that helped build America and gives families fun projects to work on together. Produced in Wilmington, Delaware check out their Easter Digital Paper Pack, Printable Pastel Bunny Spring Pattern, Pastel Background Patterns, Easter Printable Instant Download 12×12 12Pack at:

There are tons of other great scrapbooking and art designs available there too – Enjoy and have family fun night this week!

Freedom of Speech Classic – Dee Snider’s PMRC Senate Hearing Speech (Full)

Dee Snider of Twisted Sister lays it down on Tipper Gore and Freedom of Speech in the music world. They fought against forces we couldn’t possibly imagine to make sure their music could be heard. They never gave up, they refused to listen to others and paved the way to change the future of slanderous and libelous news reporting. Twisted Sister just earned Hall of Fame honors in my world. Good for you Dee, thank you for helping change the perception of rock and roll and for representing your faith proudly.

Freedom of Speech Classic – Dee Snider’s PMRC Senate Hearing Speech (Full)

Dee Snider of Twisted Sister lays it down on Tipper Gore and Freedom of Speech in the music world. They fought against forces we couldn’t possibly imagine to make sure their music could be heard. They never gave up, they refused to listen to others and paved the way to change the future of slanderous and libelous news reporting. Twisted Sister just earned Hall of Fame honors in my world. Good for you Dee, thank you for helping change the perception of rock and roll and for representing your faith proudly.


Children of all ages can learn the benefits of and practice meditation every day in a fun and relaxing environment. My son Logan was misdiagnosed with ADHD and prescribed Adderall at 3-Years-Old by his local school district. Three years later, he has been practicing mindful meditation, reading motivational and mentoring stories and listening to binaural beats and guided meditations nearly every night. His behavior and performance at school dramatically improved and his creationist ability and astral projection dreaming is profound.

Watch more free videos at:


Freedom of Speech is gone. Please Download this image and post it everywhere you possibly can.

On Monday, September 16, I found and posted to Facebook, an instant classic and potentially VIRAL political satire drawing of Russian President, Vladimir Putin submitting Barack Hussein Obama II, President of the United States with an ARMBAR. The arm bar is a famous move from Judo, Sambo, Brazilian Jiu Jitsu (BJJ), Submission Grappling and Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) made famous by The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).

The post stated, “Politics aside, Click LIKE if you think it’s awesome an ARMBAR from Grappling/MMA was used in a major political satire campaign”. For some reason, Facebook removed the image with 687 likes and nearly 100 comments in less than 20 minutes from all my accounts without warning or explanation. It is a clear example of censorship and infringes on our First Amendment rights as Americans.

Please download this image and POST everywhere you can with tags like ww3, Obama vs Putin, world war 3, submission, ARMBAR, Mma, BJJ, Grappling

We cannot be afraid to express our views or share the political views of talented artists or Satirical cartoonists. If we simply want PEACE, we must be allowed to voice out opposition to war. I
Didn’t have a “horse in this race”, I’m not the artist, but when I see our rights being stripped from us as Americans, I must stand up and call it like it is.

Please don’t be afraid of tyranny, our founding fathers protected our rights and many died for those rights. If we don’t say anything, if we sit quietly while our rights are slowly stripped away, if we blindly follow war mongering leaders we do Not believe in, we become lemmings, sheep being lead to slaughter without any concern for our safety or future.

Yes, I don’t want World War 3, yes, I
Thought it was awesome that Putin was Armbarring President Barack Hussein Obama because Submissions and Armbars have crossed over into mainstream and YES, I firmly believe in the United States Constitution and pray every day for our government and websites like Google, Yahoo, Bing, Facebook, Twitter and all the rest to uphold those same principles and laws for the American people.

Most people I talk to know their fantasy football team stats better than the most important document in our nations history, so I’m posting our Bill of Rights below for ALL to read.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.

Google translate for Russian visitors – we are ALL one, lets have peace on earth

Владимир Путин vs Barack Obama
Свободы слова нет. Пожалуйста, скачайте это изображение и разместить его везде вы возможно. В понедельник, 16 сентября я нашел и размещены на Facebook, политическая карикатура сатира

Путин против Обамы смешанным боевым искусствам и самбо болевым совпадать, чтобы избежать мировой войны 3

Обама, не моча от президента, который может надрать тебе задницу

Inspirational Quote for Emotionalizing Death of a Loved One by Brian Cimins and Artwork by Eric Zippe

“The Best way to remember someone who’s passed away is to carry on the wishes, aspirations, dreams and heart consciousness of that person. They live forever in your mind, spirit and inspirational actions when you magnify the power of LOVE and make the world a better place” – Brian Cimins

Check out more amazing artwork from Eric Zippe at:

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: